|
Family Association is a Fundamental Human Right
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Threats Issued - AFAC has received multiple reports that some of the named defendants, and others associated with them, have threatened to ‘get’ Suzanne Shell, describing certain tactics explicitly. These threatening comments were overheard in a public area. In view of the characters of the persons issuing these threats, we are adopting a cautious posture regarding them, Even though such conduct is beyond our comprehension, we will not make the potentially fatal mistake of underestimating how low one would sink in order to ‘get’ Suzanne. Therefore, Suzanne wants to establish the record in this regard before the fact.
Suzanne believes that not only her reputation and liberty, but her life and safety are in danger should she venture into Fremont County, Colorado, and that the influence of those who are party to these threats possibly extends beyond Fremont County. She is concerned that any number of untoward events could be precipitated against her which would result in her injury or death or make it appear that she had broken some law. It would be a simple and tidy trick to manipulate circumstances wherein she would be arrested and jailed, and brought before Judge Marshall to have her case heard. In anticipation of this possibility, Suzanne’s attorney has been advised of the potential danger represented by these persons.
For the record, Suzanne does not use drugs or illegal substances, she is not suicidal and never has been suicidal. She has no criminal history, no D&N cases, no history or practice of alcohol abuse or driving under the influence. She is a law-abiding member of society.
If Suzanne is arrested for any reason, or if she should be ‘accidentally’ injured or meet an untimely demise, and given the overt official hostility she experiences as a result of her work, readers need to be forewarned that there is little likelihood that any state or county agency would expend much effort to investigate the circumstances or to ascertain the truth.
The defendants have reportedly been a little bothered that their names are ‘plastered all over this web site.’ Out of deference to their sensibilities, we have, as always, confined their names to this single page. However, the documents filed with the U.S. District Court are a matter of public record, and are faithfully reproduced here for all to see and arrive at their own conclusions. Currently, this site gets about 250,000 hits a month and that figure has been steadily increasing.
Still, reportedly those most offended at the public exposure of their conduct are seeking to have this site shut down. We can only rely on the protections afforded by the first amendment and remind those less versed in the law of the following legal maxim: Prior restraints, such as those imposed by Judge Marshall which precipitated this lawsuit, and such as those now which are reportedly sought by the same persons with regard to this web site are not recognized as a legitimate legal remedy in any other court of this land. Neither can content be censored or controlled in the land of the free and home of the brave. If one doesn’t like what is presented by Suzanne to the court of public opinion, one either has the option of changing his or her conduct so that it does not appear so offensive to the public, or to sue Ms. Shell for slander or libel. That has been legally recognized as the appropriate venue in which to ‘go for the jugular.’ Alas, Ms. Shell cannot be silenced by any questionable attempts to infringe on her consitutionally protected rights. She is also not vulnerable to typical attacks which other advocacy organizations have suffered when someone tried to prevent them from publishing their websites.
One can’t help but wonder what perverse malevolence would drive anyone to employ the full brunt of legal force against the most destitute and weak with such apparent relish, regardless of the morality or consequences of those actions. Certainly, any person with a conscience would see that using one’s vast power to harm those least able to protect themselves, with no more justification than to ‘win’ against a more worthy and less vulnerable opponent who champions the cause of the weak and oppressed, is an unworthy measure of manhood or of the validity of one’s actions. One can certainly pity such poor specimans of mankind for succumbing to their own fears in such a depraved manner.
|
|
|
|
|
EMAIL THE AMERICAN FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER *** Our client lists are confidential. Please do not ask who disclosed certain information to AFAC. This information is not available to the public and will be vigorously guarded from disclosure to protect those clients whose children remain at risk of state-sanctioned kidnaping of their children.
Information included on these pages is not legal advice, we are not attorneys. You are advised to consult with an attorney on any legal matters.
Any legal documents on this site were prepared and/or drafted by attorneys or under the supervision of an attorney, or by pro se respondent parents and/or subject children and are published here with their permission. Any phone calls or other oral communications with our staff may be recorded at our discretion. Any person engaging in conversation with any of our staff is presumed to have given express consent to be recorded. ALL MATERIAL ON THESE PAGES IS COPYRIGHT 1996-2007 SUZANNE SHELL reproduction without written permission is prohibited.
IF YOU COPY OR DISTRIBUTE ANYTHING ON THIS WEB SITE, YOU ARE ENTERING INTO A CONTRACT. SEE COPYRIGHT NOTICE & SECURITY AGREEMENT (READ BEFORE ACCESSING THIS WEB SITE) - Copyright 1996- 2007, Suzanne Shell and individual contributors where appropriate. The content if this web site is intended to generate income, it is not free if you intend to archive, copy, print or distribute anything electronically fixed herein. Simply put, read, browse, learn freely. Copy, print, save, or distribute - get permission first or pay.
Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission. This web site is licensed to be viewed on a computer only.Permission and limited, non-exclusive license to reproduce this web site, by any method including but not limited to magnetically, digitally, electronically or hard copy, may be purchased for $5,000 (five thousand dollars) per printed hard copy page per copy, in advance of printing. We accept Visa, Mastercard, American Express, check, money order or cash. WE DO NOT ACCEPT GOVERNMENT PO’S - this fee schedule specifically applies to any state agency, employee, contractor, GAL, attorney or CPS service provider or any person listed on the Consumer Advisory. CPS agencies and associates have found this site to be extremely valuable, preferring the contents of this site to any other site. Hence, the premium price. Family Rights activists or advocates may obtain reduction or waiver of license fees upon request.
All online purchases through Payloadz (tm) are nonrefundable. In the case of a dispute involving a purchase, the purchaser agrees that the record of electronic delivery generated by the online document delivery service shall constitute incontrovertible proof that the item charged was delivered to an authorized user of the credit card or online payment service account. If the card owner contests the charge the document was delivered and we are charged fees for a charge back, cardholder agrees to pay to us the amount of the purchase plus $50 or double the purchase price, whichever is greater, upon demand.
If this intellectual property is stolen, infringed or used to harm any member or associate family of any Family Rights group, the copyright holder will seek appropriate remedies under applicable laws. Anyone visiting this site consents to jurisdiction and venue remaining in El Paso County, Colorado.
|
|
|
